登陆注册
20296900000006

第6章

A great many of the writers who have occupied themselves in the investigation of value -- and, we may add, for a long time many of the best of them -- have for this reason refused to consider at all the idea that value may arise from utility; they assert that the value of goods comes from the difficulty of their attainment, and is proportionate to it. Those again who have based their theory upon utility, have, for the most part, done so in a manifestly unsatisfactory fashion. They have either placed themselves in contradiction to the facts already mentioned without explaining away the contradiction, or laid so much stress on these facts that, in the end, they can scarcely be distinguished from those writers who have rejected the principle of utility, except by their express avowal of that principle.

Only a few authors, the more important of whom are mentioned in the preface, have struck the right road. These have conceived the idea of Use Value in such a way that it is neither confuted nor disturbed by the foregoing considerations, but on the contrary is entirely confirmed by them.

It is as these last-mentioned writers understand it that Imean to state the theory of value. Before beginning, I may be allowed to make a single introductory remark as to the manner in which I intend to carry out my task, and, particularly, as to the nature of the proofs which will be used.

The economist who undertakes to explain value has to explain the procedure of those who value. He describes in plain language the meaning of transactions carried on, times without number, by all of us. He does, on a large scale and with a difficult subject, the same thing as one who accurately describes some trade or some mechanical operation, which every one can do, but which it is not easy, without the assistance of concrete instances, to present and follow up in all its complexity of conditions. As the poet gives expression to the thought which every one feels but cannot express, or the actor's genius shows the passion which perhaps he may not even feel, so does the man of science describe in words, and apart from their concrete realisation, the actions which every one is accustomed to perform. He does not require to have any actual case before him, or to accompany his description with any practical working out.

Any layman in economics knows the whole substance of the theory of value from his own experience, and is a layman only in so far as he does not grasp the matter theoretically, i.e.

independently, and for and by itself, -- but only practically, --that is to say, in some given situation, and in connection with its working out in that situation. If this be true, how else shall we better prove our scientific statements than by appealing to the recollection which every one must have of his own economic actions and behaviour? For this reason, every expression which may be taken as confirming this recollection, is welcome as an aid to our investigation. For instance, when we find that the unbiassed answer of the layman indicates that he considers usefulness to be the source of value, this judgment is a finger-post which we dare not neglect, unless the most searching and careful examination has proved that it points in a wrong direction. And who else is the final judge of the theory but the public? The only true theory of the estimate we call "value,"will be that to which practical life gives its entire assent.

Only, of course, the judge must first himself be educated. He has to judge whether he recognises himself in a description which informs him about his own life and being, and which he himself is incapable of giving.

I trust that what follows may meet the approval of those who not only act economically, but reflect on their actions. I have no other wish than to gain this approval, but I cannot allow the right of judgment to those who protest without having reflected.

It costs much trouble to give a clear description of even the simplest and most familiar trade or business, and certainly, in the theoretical study of a matter so many-sided and complicated as that of value -- even though it is so familiar to all, perhaps because it is so familiar to all -- we cannot do without the most earnest and ample reflection.

同类推荐
  • 定应大师布袋和尚传

    定应大师布袋和尚传

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 遵闻录

    遵闻录

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 陈莘田外科方案

    陈莘田外科方案

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 皆大欢喜

    皆大欢喜

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 诘术篇

    诘术篇

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
热门推荐
  • 素质教育在日本

    素质教育在日本

    多一些赞美,少一些指责,日本人认为,一个孩子发展成为一个成熟的人,应包括以下四个含义:身体的独立;知能的独立;经济的独立;精神的独立。
  • 总裁的神秘情人

    总裁的神秘情人

    五光十色的城市充斥着形形色色的人,夜色太朦胧,而这个奢靡的酒吧聚集着这个城市各个阶层的人们。吧台前站着的女人吸引了很多人的注意,她年轻、性感,黑色的高跟映衬着婀娜的身姿,酒红色的头发,朦胧的灯光映照下异常妖艳美丽。一个本性纯良的女子意外在酒吧结识了总裁大人,糊里糊涂的就被带上了床,本准备当做一夜情算了,却被迫成了这个总裁背后的秘密情人。可是不是说是秘密情人么?这样的行为是要公开的节奏么?不要,我的男神可不是你!!
  • 最后恋曲

    最后恋曲

    是谁在前世,对着我放纵的哭泣;是谁在今生,苦苦地把我追寻;眼角下的柔情百转,会是谁眼中的璀璨星华?眼下一公分的位置,朱砂点不出的效果,如此真实。泪痣,三生石上刻下的印记,连转世都抹不掉的痕迹。假如这个传说是真的,那给我刻下你的印记,来世再与你相伴......
  • 郎才女貌:红颜尚书傻公主

    郎才女貌:红颜尚书傻公主

    意外穿越,她成了一个不受宠的公主,身负累累血仇,一朝有女终长成,一笑倾城,谁的心迷失在梅林深处?仗剑高歌,谁许下了一生一世的诺言?舌战群臣,谁又错把红颜认武装?当身份被揭穿,生死仅在一线,又是谁不惜一切只为保她平安?
  • 青少年应该知道的自然环境

    青少年应该知道的自然环境

    《青少年应该知道的自然环境》内容简介:我们生活的这个大干世界中无奇不有,在那里你能见到茂密的森林、浩瀚的大海、碧绿的湖泊、蜿蜒的河流,还有在地球上生活和生长着的各种动植物,大自然就像一位慈祥的母亲一样养育着我们,对待大自然“慈母”,我们必须善待她,同她和谐相处。因为地球只有一个,为了子孙后代的可持续发展,我们必须永远爱护生态环境,制止环境污染,反对不顾后果的野蛮掠夺。
  • 仙神修记

    仙神修记

    “离开父母,走出山村的少年。拜他人做父为母,应奇遇菜园老人,引导其走上了一途修仙逆的不归道”……
  • 古绘诗经名物

    古绘诗经名物

    纵使你被生活逼迫,于无限重复中奔忙;纵使你无暇感慨,甚至不曾为眼前的现实而驻足;纵使你匆匆追求,前方依旧茫然却不敢停下脚步,有种美足以感染你,挤出片刻时光,享受沉淀千年的感动——这就是《诗经》赋予生活的意义。《古绘诗经名物》汲取《诗经》极致之美,辅以古代日本学者渊在宽特为《诗经》所作的百余幅古画。让这些首次面世的古画为您呈现出诗文真实、完整的意境,带您穿越千年,体验图文带来不可抗拒的感动。
  • 逍遥兵王

    逍遥兵王

    十年磨一剑,他是华夏国送外军磨练出来的一把利刃。十年铸辉煌,他是至尊圣神等待亿万年的传承者。十年闯天下,他是敌人眼里握着收割命运镰刀的死神。十年成霸业,且看一代兵王,如何掀起三界杀戮。
  • 黑客要不要这么逗

    黑客要不要这么逗

    作为一个黑客,能不能不要这么逗逼,有点职业道德好不好!
  • 盖世邪仙

    盖世邪仙

    九州八域,群雄争霸。圣、妖、魔三修鼎立,战争不断。一个普通的少年,得上古大神传承,逆乱阴阳,改天换地。